|
mother dauther sex , titanic in 1912, desperate housewife , kids news, skincare, older naked , london uk, clip on hair extensions, hair frizz products, menopause cartoons, older fat women , population over 50 years , folicle, personals, women 50 and over , over 50 sluts , editorial cartoons, treatments, hair:a book of braiding and styles/book and 3 scrunchies, williw whitelaw,
|
It is a class all of women, who have self-selected to take this class, so they probably don't consciously think that everything has been solved and women now have it completely soho hunky-dory. But unconsciously, soho I think that message surrounds them, and it's hard for them to resist soho it. And reading about how a Calvinist consistory sought to excommunicate a woman and her whole household because the woman wore her hair in curls certainly, on the face of it, encourages them to think, "Wow, we have it SO much better now!" To which I want to say: Okay, in most (not all!) churches today, you are not going to be excommunicated for how you wear your hair. Does this mean that hairstyles don't mean anything today? Do you think you're really free to wear your hair however you like without consequences? What do you think would happen if you got a buzzcut, for instance? How do you think people would react? Do you think that on a job interview, employers would react to you differently if you had hair below your butt that hadn't been cut in 10 years than if you had a nice little neat shining bob?
|
